Impronta di precisione in protesi fissa: caratteristiche dei materiali


1. Afsharzand Z, Rashedi B, Petropoulos VC. Communication between the dental laboratory technician and dentist: work authorization for fixed partial dentures. J Prosthodont 2006;15(2):123-8.

2. Stewart CA. An audit of dental prescriptions between clinics and dental laboratories. Br Dent J 2011;211(3):E5.


3. Afsharzand Z, Rashedi B, Petropoulos VC. Dentist communication with the dental laboratory for prosthodontic treatment using implants. J Prosthodont 2006;15(3):202-7.

4. Goodacre CJ, Campagni WV, Aquilino SA. Tooth preparations for complete crowns: an art form based on scientific principles. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85(4):363-76.

5. Subasi G, et al. Evaluation of marginal fit of two all-ceramic copings with two finish lines. Eur J Dent 2012;6(2):163-8.

6. Castillo Oyague R, Sanchez-Jorge MI, Sanchez Turrion A. Influence of CAD/CAM scanning method and toothpreparation design on the vertical misfit of zirconia crown copings. Am J Dent 2010;23(6):341-6.

7. Hmaidouch R, Neumann P, Mueller WD. Influence of preparation form, luting space setting and cement type on the marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM crown copings. Int J Comput Dent 2011;14(3):219-26.

8. Lu H, Nguyen B, Powers JM. Mechanical properties of 3 hydrophilic addition silicone and polyether elastomeric impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92(2):151-4.

9. Lawson NC, et al. Flow profile of regular and fast-setting elastomeric impression materials using a shark fin testing device. J Esthet Restor Dent 2011;23(3):171-6.

10. Ayad MF. Effects of tooth preparation burs and luting cement types on the marginal fit of extracoronal restorations. J Prosthodont 2009;18(2):145-51.

11. Ayad MF, Johnston WM, Rosenstiel SF. Influence of dental rotary instruments on the roughness and wettability of human dentin surfaces. J Prosthet Dent 2009;102(2):81-8.

12. Luthardt RG, et al. Clinical parameters influencing the accuracy of 1- and 2-stage impressions: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Prosthodont 2008;21(4):322-7.

13. Lang NP, Schätzle MA, Löe H. Gingivitis as a risk factor in periodontal disease. J Clin Periodontol 2009;36(10):3-8.

14. Newby EE, et al. Quantification of gingival contour and volume from digital impressions as a novel method for assessing gingival health. Int Dent J 2011;61(3):4-12.

15. Al Hamad KQ, et al. A clinical study on the effects of cordless and conventional retraction techniques on the gingival and periodontal health. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35(12):1053-8.

16. Baharav H, et al. The effect of sulcular width on the linear accuracy of impression materials in the presence of an undercut. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17(5):585-9.

17. Kosyfaki P, del Pilar Pinilla Martin M, Strub JR. Relationship between crowns and the periodontium: a literature update. Quintessence Int 2010;41(2):109-26.

18. Tanaka J, et al. Relationship between Cariogenic Bacteria and pH of Dental Plaque at Margin of Fixed Prostheses. Int J Dent 2012;2012:452108.

19. Hamalian TA, Nasr E, Chidiac JJ. Impression materials in fixed prosthodontics: influence of choice on clinical procedure. J Prosthodont 2011;20(2):153-60.

20. Christensen GJ. What category of impression material is best for your practice? J Am Dent Assoc 1997;128(7):1026-8.

21. Walker MP, et al. Moisture effect on polyether and polyvinylsiloxane dimensional accuracy and detail reproduction. J Prosthodont 2005;14(3):158-63.

22. Acar O, Erkut S, Lakshmipathy M. Surface detail reproduction under simulated pulpal pressure: a 3-dimensional optical profilometer and scanning electron microscopy evaluation. J Prosthet Dent 2012;108(2):102-13.

23. Kanehira M, Finger WJ, Komatsu M. Surface detail reproduction with new elastomeric dental impression materials. Quintessence Int 2007;38(6):479-88.

24. Petrie CS, et al. Dimensional accuracy and surface detail reproduction of two hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane impression materials tested under dry, moist and wet conditions. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90(4):365-72.

25. Jorgensen KD. A new method of recording the elastic recovery of dental impression materials. Scand J Dent Res 1976;84(3):175-82.

26. Balkenhol M, et al. Influence of prolonged setting time on permanent deformation of elastomeric impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 2010;103(5):288-94.

27. Lawson NC, Burgess JO, Litaker MS. Tensile elastic recovery of elastomeric impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 2008;100(1):29-33.

28. Berg JC, et al. Temperature effects on the rheological properties of current polyether and polysiloxane impression materials during setting. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90(2):150-61.

29. Papadogiannis D, et al. Effect of storage time on the viscoelastic properties of elastomeric impression materials. J Prosthodont Res 2012;56(1):11-8.

30. Gomez-Polo M, et al. Influence of technique and pouring time on dimensional stability of polyvinyl siloxane and polyether impressions. Int J Prosthodont 2012;25(4):353-6.

31. Pant R, et al. Long-term dimensional stability and reproduction of surface detail of four polyvinyl siloxane duplicating materials. J Dent 2008;36(6):456-61.

32. Rodriguez JM, Bartlett DW. The dimensional stability of impression materials and its effect on in vitro tooth wear studies. Dent Mater 2011;27(3):253-8.

33. Kanehira M, Finger WJ, Endo T. Volatilization of components from and water absorption of polyether impressions. J Dent 2006;34(2):134-8.

34. Kotsiomiti E, Tzialla A, Hatjivasiliou K. Accuracy and stability of impression materials subjected to chemical disinfection – a literature review. J Oral Rehabil 2008;35(4):291-9.

35. Rupp F, Geis-Gerstorfer J. Hydrophilicity of unset and set elastomeric impression materials. Int J Prosthodont 2010;23(6):552-4.

36. Hosseinpour D, Berg JC. The dynamic interaction of water with four dental impression materials during cure. J Prosthodont 2009;18(4):292-300.

37. Balkenhol M, Eichhorn M, Wostmann B. Contact angles of contemporary type 3 impression materials. Int J Prosthodont 2009;22(4):396-8.

38. Helvey GA. Elastomeric impression materials: factors to consider. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2011;32(8):58-9.

Impronta di precisione in protesi fissa: caratteristiche dei materiali - Ultima modifica: 2013-07-10T14:35:15+00:00 da Redazione

1 commento

  1. Fili di retrazione gengivale nella rilevazione di impronte dentali | DM Il Dentista Moderno

    […] protesi fissa su dente naturale le impronte dentali di precisione è una fase clinica dall’importanza […]